As April 24 nears, those who plan to confront Turkey with Armenia's deportation seem to be fueling the Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict too.
Those who have been pressuring Turkey in the international arena over the 1915 incident in the last century overlook the reality that the state (the Ottomans) punished the perpetrators of the incident and instead choose to mutter the words “genocide” and “tragedy” instead.
On the 100th anniversary of the 1915 incidents, Turkey launched a new initiative. It created a base for archives to be opened and historians to discuss this issue in detail. But remember that an invisible hand threw in the lie that Turkey entered a “normalization period with Armenia” despite Azerbaijan. Erdoğan, the prime minister at the time, made a speech in the Azerbaijan parliament and said, “We will not open the borders until the invasion of Nagorno-Karabakh ends.”
We see an Armenia that tries to provoke Azerbaijan as April 24 draws near. We have Azerbaijani martyrs as a result of this provocation. But there is another reality; Azerbaijan defeated Armenia.
If Azerbaijan wishes, it can totally clear Armenia from Nagorno-Karabakh. Yet this has the ability to shake all Caucasia, moreover the world.
Those who want to put a pledge on the new energy corridors want this conflict to intensify.
THE WASHINGTON COALITION
Remember the coalition formed in front of the Brookings Institution in Washington. Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP), Democratic Union Party (PYD), Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia (ASALA) and the Gülenist Terror Organization (FETÖ) supporters came together to protest President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the Turkish delegation accompanying him.
It would be good to remember how this coalition was formed in the recent past. Last year on the 100-year anniversary of the 1915 incidents the “Genocide Proposal” was presented to the US House of Representatives. Some of the people who signed the proposal were John Conyers, Joseph Kennedy, Loretta Sanchez, Linda Sanchez, Daniel Lipinski and Scott Garrett.
Well, is this the only common characteristic these names have? Signing the “Genocide Proposal”? These names have also received donations from the parallel structure.
Are we surprised? No!
I wrote a few times before. I would like to remind you again. Abdullah Aymaz, the No. 2 man of the structure, also known as “Hodja,” has made donations to these senators. The proof can be found on the Internet.
Let's move on...
THE TRUTH BEHIND THE LETTERS OF THE 74 SENATORS
Another reminder: I am talking about President Obama's sentences that start with, “Turkey's freedom of the press....”
Another reminder for those who think “What is the reason for Obama's criticism?”
Again with the initiative of parallel structure members, 74 US senators signed a letter saying, “Turkey does not have freedom of the press.”
It was then revealed that those who signed this letter were given a substantial donation by the parallel structure.
Our last example is from Azerbaijan...
SOKAR is Azerbaijan's state petrol company. This company has always been the Parallel Structure's focus of interest. We have plenty of archives on this particular issue. The parallel structure's activities in Azerbaijan, especially on the SOKAR issue, have been the point of discussion between Turkey and Azerbaijan recently. We know that those who “changed their names” and continued somehow, are under examination...
The Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict sitting at the top of the world's agenda as November 24 draws near, it seems like a new plot by a big coalition.
Those who perceive Turkey and especially Erdoğan as the enemy seem to have given Azerbaijan and Aliyev the same position.
As journalist Ardan Zentürk says, “Whoever is going after Erdoğan is the same person going after Aliyev.”
They preach but don't practice
Azeri journalist Ganire Ataşova could not hold back her tears while asking President Erdoğan a question. A debate started... How can a journalist not hold back her emotions?
Arguments started on clichés like “A journalist is one who informs. One that does not give in to feelings and emotions. One that transfers an incident as is.”
These clichés are used by those who are on trial for “spying” and those who used the “İmrali officers” heading as a method to veil their doings...
One thing is especially hard to forget. Remember one Eid morning when President Erdoğan was prime minister, he greeted the journalists and wished them a happy Eid? He gave a symbolic amount of pocket money to a journalist who kissed his hand (this is an Eid tradition in which the younger ones kiss their elder's hands and receive pocket money on Eid mornings.)
One journalist made a row out of this.
Kadri Gürsel was the journalist who said, “How can a correspondent kiss a hand. How can he receive pocket money...” However, that same journalist did not see any harm in joining the $10,000 bar trips organized by the parallel structure.
Remember Cüneyt Özdemir, who tweeted journalist Aslı Aydıntaşbaş's selfie with US Vice President Joe Biden saying, “He said hello to me.”
While judging “others” with clichés they see all kinds of relations permissible.
Our proverb to those who use people as shields: “They don't practice what they preach.”
Differences in HBDH's terror acts between regions
The PKK terror organization recently established an umbrella organization which embraced many marginal leftist terror organizations. They named it the People's United Revolution Movement's (HBDH).
They have the Communist Party of Turkey/Marxist Leninist (TKP/ML) and the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party (MLKP) within it.
PKK member Duran Kalkan was chosen leader. According to intelligence units, the HBDH divided Turkey into four regions and developed action strategies accordingly.
Now, the question is: An illegal group calling itself the “Revolutionary High Schoolers' Association” (Devrimci Liseliler Birliği) tried to turn Ankara into a war zone on the weekend.
Another group in Kahramanmaraş, another corner of the country, yelled “Long live the brotherhood of the people” slogans on the one hand, and shouting “We don't want the Syrians here” on the other...
Are these two acts a product of the HBDH terror organization's new strategy?
I believe they are.
What do you think?